|
Results (continued) A Comparison
of EA-Wax with Detection by Phosphoimaging. In order to determine the value of the EA-Wax system, we compared the results of direct image analysis, using a Molecular Dynamics Phosphoimager, with data obtained after wax impregnation. In order to achieve this, cells of Salmonella were grown at 37oC and radiolablelled with 35S-methionine (as described in Materials and Methods). Samples were then sonicated and analysed by 2-D gel electrophoresis, prior to electroblotting onto PVDF membrane. The resulting membrane was then phosphimaged directly for 24 h. Subsequently the membrane was impregnated in EA-Wax as described above and was then exposed to autoradiography film for 24 h. The results of both treatments are shown (Figure 5). It can clearly be seen that wax treatment resulted in a major enhancement in the speed and sensitivity of detection by autoradiography and indeed, the images obtained using both systems were very similar.
S35 labelled cells of Salmonella were fractionated by 2-D electrophoresis using IPG strips (pI 3-10; left to right) from Amersham-Pharmacia, prior to electroblotting onto a PVDF membrane. The membrane was imaged for 24h using a Molecular Dynamics Phosphoimager (panel A, left). Subsequently, the membrane was processed using the EA-Wax kit and exposed to X-ray film for 24 h (panel B, right). Conclusion
| ||||